Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in a case that should be interesting reading for anyone dealing with promissory notes. In Creative Ventures, LLC v. Jim Ward & Associates, the court reached the following conclusions:
•Loans arranged by a corporation not licensed as a real estate broker are not entitled to the usury exemption for real estate secured loans made or arranged by a California licensed real estate broker (Cal. Civ. Code § 1916.1) even if the individual acting on behalf of the corporation was a licensed real estate broker.
•Investors in promissory notes may be liable for usury when the notes have not been negotiated to those investors and thus the investors were not holders in due course (see Cal. Comm. Code § 3305).
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.