"Cy Pres" Award to Charity From Class Action Settlement Was Improper


In Dennis v. Kellogg Co., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18576 (9th Cir. Sept. 4, 2012), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided an interesting class action case. The case involved a class action relating to alleged deceptive advertising claims concerning the marketing of children’s cereal products.

A large manufacturer of children’s cereal products prepared an advertising campaign that claimed its breakfast cereal was scientifically proven to improve children’s cognitive functions subsequent to a morning breakfast.

A class representative filed suit against the cereal manufacturer, alleging violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) (Business and Professional Code 17200). and asserting a claim of unjust enrichment. The plaintiff alleged that the marketing claims were false. Subsequently, the parties agreed to settle the case.

As part of the settlement, any funds that were not distributed to class members were designated as donations to selected charities pursuant to the well known “cy pres” doctrine. Two class members objected to that approach, arguing that the use of “cy pres” relief was improper, as applied in the case. The district court approved the class settlement over objections of the class members.

The Ninth Circuit reversed the trial court’s decision. The Ninth Circuit noted that the “cy pres” doctrine is a method of distributing damages to silent members of a class action. The Ninth Circuit explained that use of the “cy pres” doctrine allows courts to distribute funds causing indirect benefits. The Ninth Circuit cautioned, however, that a “cy pres” award must be guided by the objectives of the underlying statutes and the interests of the class members not actively involved in the case.

The Ninth Circuit concluded that the “cy pres” award here was too disconnected from the underlying California consumer statutes. Although feeding the poor is an important public policy concern, the court concluded that goal had little or nothing to do with the purposes of the underlying lawsuit.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.