Debt Buyer Sued for Deceptive Practices of Downstream Third-Party Collectors; CFPB Uses Its Substantial Assistance Authority

Venable LLP
Contact

Venable LLP

On January 10, 2022, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a complaint in federal district court against three affiliated debt-buying businesses and the individuals who founded and operated them for "knowingly and recklessly [placing debts with and selling them to] debt collection agencies that used threats and misrepresentations to coerce payments from consumers."

The corporate defendants are in the business of purchasing portfolios of defaulted consumer debt and then placing those portfolios with (or selling them to) third-party debt collectors. The CFPB alleges that the third-party debt collectors engaged in illegal debt collection practices, such as falsely threatening consumers with lawsuits and arrest, and that the defendants who placed the debt with (or in some cases sold it to) the debt collectors are directly liable for violating the Consumer Financial Protection Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Of note is the CFPB's use of its substantial assistance authority here to attempt to hold the defendants liable for the actions of downstream third parties. The CFPB points to the fact that the three companies received hundreds of complaints about the deceptive collection practices either directly from the consumers or through the consumers' creditors and failed to take meaningful action to correct them. According to the CFPB, the companies claimed to have separated themselves from some of the debt collectors, but internal documents reviewed by the CFPB showed that the companies continued to place debt portfolios with and sell them to debt collectors that they claimed were terminated.

"Companies cannot profit and evade liability simply by creating a maze of shape-shifting entities and enabling third parties to take advantage of consumers," said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra.

The CFPB's actions signal a willingness by the Bureau to target creditors for the abusive or deceptive debt collection practices of third parties. A strong third-party vendor management program can help to minimize this risk. Such a program must include:

  • Due diligence of each collection agency and debt buyer
  • Complaint data analysis to identify potentially problematic conduct
  • Ongoing monitoring of collection agencies
  • Accountability

The bottom line is that companies in the business of placing or selling consumer debt may be held responsible for what happens to the debt downstream.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Venable LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Venable LLP
Contact
more
less

Venable LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide