This month, in Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann, the United States Supreme Court unanimously sided with the State of Oklahoma in the state’s long battle with the State of Texas concerning the Red River Compact, 94 Stat. 3305 (“the Compact”). The case represents a significant win for the State of Oklahoma and the preservation of its water management authority. The decision is also significant for other states that may face similar interstate transfer issues because it demonstrates the Court’s unwillingness to allow interstate water transfers over a state’s objection where the applicable compact language is less than clear.
By way of background, the Compact is a multi-state agreement that allocates water rights within the Red River Basin among Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana. Under the Compact, the river is divided into five separate subdivisions called reaches and each reach is further divided into smaller subbasins. The Compact governs the allocation of water within each reach and subbasin.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Cross-Border, Red River Compact, SCOTUS, Water, Water Rights
Published In: General Business Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates, Environmental Updates, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck | Attorney Advertising