Delaware Court of Chancery Allows Depositions of Foreign Witnesses to Establish Personal Jurisdiction


The Delaware Court of Chancery recently addressed the extent to which a plaintiff may depose witnesses for the purpose of establishing personal jurisdiction under a conspiracy theory.

Plaintiff Dennis A. Reid sued Alenia Spazio, Alcatel Alenia Space Italia, S.p.A, and Finmeccanica S.p.A. alleging that defendants conspired to divest U.S. Russian Telecommunications, LLC of its interest in a business venture intended to exploit, for commercial gain, satellite orbital slots controlled by Russia.

The defendants moved to dismiss on the grounds that the Delaware Chancery Court did not have personal jurisdiction. The plaintiff sought to depose several out-of-state witness as part of jurisdictional discovery. The defendants objected on the grounds that: 1) the depositions were cumulative or duplicative of prior discovery, 2) the plaintiff improperly delayed in seeking the requested depositions, and 3) the depositions would be unduly burdensome or expensive.

The Court noted that plaintiffs are generally entitled to reasonable discovery for the purpose of establishing personal jurisdiction and rejected all the defendants’ arguments against the depositions. First, the Court rejected the defendants’ argument that discovery would be cumulative or duplicative, because prior discovery in the case had not sufficiently addressed the personal jurisdiction issue, Second, the Court held that the plaintiff sought the proposed depositions within a reasonable period after receiving documents and responses to interrogatories. Third, while the Court acknowledged the costs of potentially deposing international witnesses in Italy, France and Russia, it held that the defendants were aware of the international expense and obstacles when they entered into the disputed transaction.

The Court concluded that the plaintiff had alleged sufficient facts to establish that the depositions would be relevant to or reasonably calculated to lead to relevant evidence on the issue of personal jurisdiction.

Reid v. Siniscalchi, No. 2874-VCN (Del. Ch. May 25, 2012).


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.