Delaware Court: Redactions in Court Filings Should Not Be an Afterthought

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact

Womble Bond Dickinson

Last week US District Court Judge Richard Andrews rejected two separate parties’ filings in the District of Delaware because portions were redacted in their entirety. This practice applies universally to all District of Delaware Judges and Delaware Courts, especially the Delaware Court of Chancery.

One filing was a discovery dispute letter and another a reply brief in support of a motion for summary judgment. Judge Andrews noted, “Absent a compelling reason, supported by a statement under oath by a party, redactions in their entirety are impermissible; redactions must be done so as to redact the least possible amount of the material submitted. Failure to make a good faith attempt at such redactions may result in sanctions, the most common of which would be simply unsealing the entire filing. Redacting in its entirety a document that contains publicly available material is prima facie evidence of bad faith.” 

This is an important reminder for practice in all Delaware courts to consider redactions well before the deadline. Also, especially in IP cases where there is a lot of propriety information, parties need to make clear to the Court that the redactions have been applied according to the Court Rules.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Womble Bond Dickinson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact
more
less

Womble Bond Dickinson on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide