Rhodes v. Consumers' Byline, Inc., 868 F.Supp. 368 (1993)

Does an arbitration clause in a contract require the stay or dismissal of the suit in which a party contends that the contract is unenforceable?


Consumers' Byline was a multilevel marketing and sales company. Rhodes was a participant who allegedly lost $500 through participation in Consumers' Byline. Rhodes sued, alleging various violations of New York state law, securities laws and RICO. The agreement contained a both a mandatory arbitration clause and choice of law provision designating New York law as the choice of governing law. Consumers' Byline moved to stay or dismiss, citing the arbitration clause and federal arbitration law, which requires a stay of the action until arbitration may be had.

Full case and case summary also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Rhodes_v_ConsumersBylineInc.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Federal, 1st Circuit, Massachusetts | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.