Reed v. Palmer

Does the dismissal of a pendant state securities claim in federal court act as an adjudication on the merits for res judicata purposes?

more+
less-

The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that because the federal court had pendant jurisdiction over the state law claims arising out of the same transaction as the federal claims, the plaintiff is barred res judicata from bringing additional state law claims in state court. Reeder was defrauded in a pyramid scheme and sued in federal court under federal securities laws. His state claims were dismissed for a failure to state a claim in federal court, and he sued in state court to attempt to recover on the dismissed claims. Because the Federal court had jurisdiction to here the state claims, the dismissal acted as a ruling on the merits, preventing further litigation.

The case and case summary can also be viewed online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Reed_v_Palmer.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates, Securities Updates

Reference Info:State, 5th Circuit, Louisiana | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Welcome to MLM Legal - a valuable resource to the Multi-Level Marketing and Direct Sales Industry. ... View Profile »


Follow Babener & Associates:

Reporters on Deadline