Minnesota v. Solem , 222 N.W.2d 98 (1974)

Does the Holiday Magic marketing program violate state statutes prohibiting the promotion of distribution plans based primarily on the recruitment of additional participants?


The Minnesota Supreme Court held that the Holiday Magic marketing plan violated the state multi-level marketing statute. Holiday Magic distributed cosmetics by a network of distributors who were compensated for sales and recruiting additional distributors into their downlines. The Supreme Court found that the primary purpose of the statute was to prohibit schemes that placed undue emphasis on the recruitment of additional participants and not on the sale of additional products, thereby producing a pyramiding result. Because Holiday Magic focused too much on the recruitment of additional distributors it violated the state statute.

Case and case summary also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Minnesota_v_Solem.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:State, 8th Circuit, Minnesota | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.