Don’t Lose Your Trademark When Licensing It (…or How Not to “Run Naked”)

more+
less-

For established brands, trademark licensing can be a very lucrative enterprise. It allows the brand to expand its existing markets or venture into new ones with little additional risk or investment. This was not always the case. Under common law, licensing was tantamount to abandonment, the rational being third party use of the trademark meant the mark could no longer be associated with a single source. See Macmahan Pharmacal Co. v. Denver Chem. Mfg. Co., 113 F. 468 (8th Cir. 1901). The law has evolved to embrace the reality of most intellectual property, that a trademark itself is a revenue generating property, not merely a means to protect goodwill.

Today, a trademark is licensable so long as the licensor maintains control over the quality of the product marketed under the mark. This standard is not clearly defined in a statute, but the authority to do so is: 15 U.S.C. §1055 provides that use of a trademark by a “related company . . . shall not affect the validity of such mark or registration, provided such mark is not used in such a manner as to deceive the public.”

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, General Business Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wahab & Medenica LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »