Dot Foods v. Washington Dept. of Revenue , 215 P.3d 185 (2009)

Dot Foods v. Washington Dept. of Revenue

more+
less-

The Washington Supreme Court, in a sharply divided decision, held that it was improper to change the statutory interpretation without a change in the underlying statute, and the new interpretation did not comport with the language of the statute. Dot sold products through a direct seller's representative, and some of the products were ultimately placed in retail establishments. The Department changed its interpretation of the word "exclusively" in the statute, such that the new interpretation would require all of a company's products to be sold at wholesale, along with other requirements, to avoid the state's B&O tax. Nothing had changed in how Dot had been operating, and they still qualified for the exemption under the old rules. The Supreme Court felt that the change in interpretation was not appropriate without change to the statute, especially after so much time had passed without any challenges to the previous interpretation.

Full case is also available at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/DotFoods_v_WADeptRevenue.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates, Tax Updates

Reference Info:State, 9th Circuit, Washington | United States

Reporters on Deadline

CONNECT

Welcome to MLM Legal - a valuable resource to the Multi-Level Marketing and Direct Sales Industry. ... View Profile »


Follow Babener & Associates: