EEOC Investigations Gone Wild: The Sobering Tale Of Aggressive Government Efforts To Drum Up Class Actions

by Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP
Contact

Picture this: you get to work on a Monday morning, grab a cup of coffee and turn on your computer only to find that 1,300 of your employees received an e-mail asking various questions about perceived age discrimination in your workplace as part of an “official inquiry” and a “federal investigation.”  Would that ruin your day?  It likely did for a group of HR and legal professionals at Case New Holland, Inc., a large agricultural and construction equipment business.

On June 5, 2013, without any advance notice to CNH or its counsel, an EEOC investigator sent a mass e-mail to 1,300 CNH employees on their work e-mail accounts.  The e-mail stated that CNH was the subject of a “Federal Investigation,” that the e-mail was part of “an official inquiry” and prompted employees to complete an online questionnaire which was directed to various questions of age bias at the company.

The EEOC investigator sent this e-mail after letting the matter sit dormant for 17 months, having no communications with CNH during that time frame. CNH also appears to have bent over backwards to cooperate with the EEOC, having provided it with nearly 75,000 pages of employee records.

The EEOC maintains that the mass e-mail was an “efficient” means of “identifying potential class members.”  Efficient indeed!  But, was it legal?  CNH has now sued the EEOC in federal court in Washington, D.C. claiming that the EEOC exceeded its statutory responsibilities and violated both the Administrative Procedures Act and the U.S. Constitution in doing so.

Did the EEOC break the law?  Only time will tell.  The resolution of that issue depends on complicated statutory issues involving the EEOC’s authority under the Administrative Procedures Act and complex interpretations of various provisions of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

The better questions are whether this situation is likely to repeat itself and, if so, what employers can do about it.  On the first question, the EEOC’s claim that it was “efficient” was not exactly a ringing endorsement of this particular investigator’s tactics.  But, at the same time, no one from the EEOC has said that the investigator erred or that the EEOC would discontinue use of this very aggressive means of enforcement – a statement that the EEOC may have difficulty making given the pendency of CNH’s lawsuit.

Regardless of the legality, the EEOC really would have no good reason to stand by this investigative technique.  Despite the characterization of this survey as “efficient,” the survey sought information about “age-related comments” without identifying what the EEOC considers to be such a comment.  And, the EEOC cast its net so widely that it would be gathering information about offices and individual supervisors that had nothing to do with the underlying investigation.

Whether the EEOC repeats this investigatory tactic remains to be seen.  But it does beg the question: what can employers do proactively to prevent the same thing from happening to them?  In particular, do employers have to provide outside government entities with access to their employees’ work e-mail accounts?

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act provide that the EEOC “shall . . . have access to . . . any evidence . . . that relates to unlawful employment practices,” but it does not state that employers must provide electronic means of communicating with their employees during work time using work property.  42 U.S.C. §2000e-8, 12117.  Similarly, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act allows the EEOC to “question employees” but does not specify whether an employer must allow such questioning on premises or, in this case, by using an employer’s work-related e-mail server.  29 U.S.C. §626(a); 29 U.S.C. §211.  And, California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act allows the Department of Fair Employment and Housing to investigate charges of discrimination but does not explicitly require an employer to provide access to its property in order to facilitate such an investigation.  Cal. Gov’t Code §12930.

So, the law does not require employers to provide the EEOC or the DFEH access to employers’ e-mail servers for purposes of investigating charges of discrimination.  Indeed, on the EEOC’s own website, it acknowledges that, at most, it can ask an employer to “permit” an on-site inspection and presumably the same would be true insofar as access to e-mail servers is concerned.

Does it make sense then to pre-emptively block all “eeoc.gov” or “dfeh.ca.gov” e-mail addresses from sending e-mail to employees?  It certainly seems like a drastic step, particularly for an employer faced with a simple, run-of-the-mill discrimination charge.  More importantly, it makes an employer look defensive when in most cases there is no reason to be.

But what about the employer faced with an investigator who seems hellbent on making a mountain out of a molehill – does it make sense then?  Even then, it seems like a drastic first step.  Like all of us, EEOC investigators have supervisors and frequently those supervisors are willing to assist when an employer has concerns about the scope of the investigation.  Before considering shutting off outside government access to your e-mail servers, employers should try to exhaust other, less draconian means before taking that step.

To be sure, some employers will not want to take the chance that they end up in the same position as CNH.  After all, while the investigation into CNH had been comprehensive, to say the least, the investigator had seemingly gone underground for 17 months before sending the mass e-mail, so CNH had no signal that the EEOC was going to send a mass e-mail to 1,300 of its employees.

Of course, the EEOC would be well-advised to provide guidance as to whether this investigatory technique is likely to continue.  Otherwise, it may find that otherwise cooperative employers will be blocking their e-mails from reaching employees on work e-mail addresses out of fear of becoming the next CNH.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP
Contact
more
less

Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!