Employee Mobility Alert: Ends versus Means: Courts Vary in Their Interpretation of Employee Liability under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

more+
less-

The federal courts are currently split on the question of whether an employee can be held civilly liable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) for misappropriating confidential company information that the employee is permitted to access within the scope of his or her employment. The CFAA, 18 U.S.C. § 1030 et seq., is primarily a criminal statute but provides for a private cause of action against a person who “intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains…information from any protected computer.” 18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(2). Recently, the Ninth Circuit, in LVRC Holdings LLC v. Brekka, et. al., joined a significant number of federal courts that have found that an employee who (before the termination of his or her employment) has permission to access the confidential information in question does not meet the definition of “without authorization” under the CFAA, regardless of the employee?s improper motive or misuse of the information.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Conflict of Laws Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Privacy Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Mintz Levin - Employment Matters | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »