Employment Law Commentary, March 2018, Volume 30, Issue 3 - Employers Caught in Crosshairs of Immigration Debate – Understanding and Complying with the California Immigrant Worker Protection Act

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

The increasingly polarized political climate has placed California employers in the middle of the dispute between the federal and California governments over immigration policy. On October 5, 2017, Governor Jerry Brown of California signed the Immigrant Worker Protection Act (AB 450) into law. The new statute, which took effect on January 1, 2018, imposes various prohibitions and requirements on California employers with regard to federal immigration enforcement actions in the workplace. For example, whereas employers could previously consent to federal agents’ inspection of the workplace and review of employee records, this is no longer true in California under state law. Violation of AB 450 could result in thousands of dollars in penalties for an employer. As discussed below, the federal government is currently challenging AB 450 on preemption grounds. While the future of AB 450 is uncertain, it remains in effect for now.

POTENTIAL PREEMPTION OF AB 450 BY FEDERAL LAW -

The federal government filed a lawsuit on March 6, 2018, against California, asking for AB 450 and other recently enacted California “sanctuary” laws to be declared constitutionally invalid and seeking injunctions against the enforcement of these laws. The federal government has already moved for a preliminary injunction, arguing that these laws obstruct the enforcement of federal law, including the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, in violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In its court filings, the federal government has cited to Arizona v. United States, a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case in which certain provisions of Arizona law that criminalized undocumented presence and work and authorized warrantless arrests of aliens believed to be removable from the United States were held to be preempted by federal law. The hearing on the federal government’s preliminary injunction motion is currently set for June 20, 2018, in federal court in Sacramento, California. The scheduling of the hearing, which was set recently on March 29, 2018, was delayed in part by the filing of defendants’ motion to transfer the lawsuit from Sacramento to San Francisco, where a lawsuit by California against the federal government regarding new immigration-related conditions for federal funding is being heard. The court denied defendants’ motion to transfer on March 29, 2018.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide