Employment Law Commentary -- Volume 25, Issue 7 July 2013 -- Supreme Court Buttresses Class Action Waivers


In its recent decision in Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest., 133 S. Ct. 2304 (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court further buttressed the use of class-action waivers in arbitration agreements, finding such waivers enforceable even if they would effectively prevent vindication of a federal statutory right. The decision both reinforces prior Court rulings involving class actions and arbitration, and removes some uncertainty as to the bounds of those decisions.

Previously, in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (2010), the Court held that a party may not be compelled to submit to class arbitration absent an agreement to do so. In AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), the Court held a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement enforceable, notwithstanding state law barring such waivers. In rejecting the argument that the class action waiver amounted to an unlawful exculpatory clause because small claims of the kind involved in the case would not be worth pursuing, the Court in AT&T Mobility noted various provisions in the agreement making such claims worth pursuing, notwithstanding the waiver. This created some uncertainty as to whether such provisions were necessary to make class waivers enforceable. The Am. Express opinion now removes that uncertainty. Class-action waivers are enforceable even if they effectively insulate a party from claims for violation of federal law. While the Court noted some possible limits to its holding, it made clear that preclusion of class procedures is not one of those limits.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  American Express, American Express v Italian Colors Restaurant, Arbitration, AT&T Mobility, AT&T Mobility v Concepcion, Class Action, Class Action Arbitration Waivers, Collective Actions, Federal Arbitration Act, SCOTUS

Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Morrison & Foerster is an international firm with more than 1,000 lawyers across 15 offices in the... View Profile »

Follow Morrison & Foerster LLP:

Reporters on Deadline