En Banc Ninth Circuit Limits Scope of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act - Terms of Use Do Not Restrict Authorized Access

more+
less-

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, the Ninth Circuit, in an en banc decision penned by Judge Kozinski, held that an employee could not be criminally liable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (the “CFAA”) for “exceeding authorized access” to an employer’s computer by accessing proprietary information in violation of the employer’s written policies. In so holding, the Ninth Circuit reversed course from the initial panel decision, band entrenched its split from other circuits that have interpreted the CFAA’s “exceeds authorized access” prong to cover violations of an employer’s clearly disclosed computer use policy. The Nosal decision clarifies the Ninth Circuit’s view that the CFAA targets true “hacking,” and not violations of company computer use policies or website terms of service.

Please see full Alert below for further information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: General Business Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Fenwick & West LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »