Environmental Plaintiff Dealt a Blow in Storm Water Case


A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California clarifies the plaintiff’s burden of proof in citizen suits brought under the Clean Water Act (CWA). In the long-running Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Company

(EPIC) case, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel’s recent decision denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment illuminates precisely what a citizen plaintiff must show to carry its burden of proving that alleged discharges are from a “point source” and go to “navigable waters.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.