Environmental Plaintiff Dealt a Blow in Storm Water Case


A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California clarifies the plaintiff’s burden of proof in citizen suits brought under the Clean Water Act (CWA). In the long-running Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Company

(EPIC) case, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel’s recent decision denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment illuminates precisely what a citizen plaintiff must show to carry its burden of proving that alleged discharges are from a “point source” and go to “navigable waters.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Environmental Updates, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »