The Supreme Court today handed down its decision in the widely discussed case of Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, addressing the question of whether a regulated party can obtain pre-enforcement review of EPA administrative compliance orders under the Clean Water Act (CWA). In a unanimous decision, the Court dealt EPA a major setback by reversing the lower court decision and holding that the petitioners are entitled to bring suit under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to challenge the jurisdictional basis for such orders. This decision is certain to affect procedures for issuance and review of pre-enforcement actions under the CWA and possibly other environmental statutes.
Plaintiffs Michael and Chantell Sackett own a 0.63-acre undeveloped lot near Priest Lake, Idaho, where they wish to build their family home. The lot is separated from the lake by several lots that contain permanent structures. In April and May 2007, the Sacketts filled approximately one-half acre of their property in preparation for construction. In November 2007, the EPA issued a compliance order asserting that the property was subject to the CWA because it contained wetlands and was adjacent to the lake, a “navigable water” under the statute.2 The compliance order found a CWA violation because filling had been conducted without the required permit from the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The compliance order directed the Sacketts to restore the parcel within a year and warned that failure to comply may lead to civil penalties of up to $32,500 per day.3 In April 2008, the Sacketts requested a formal administrative hearing, which the EPA denied.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.