Epic v. Apple: An Epic Fail?

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contact

Epic sued Apple in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Apple’s iOS walled garden, and, specifically, that its refusal to allow app makers to use a payment system other than the Apple store, the privilege of which cost app makers 30 percent of the fee collected, violated the Sherman Act and the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”).

On September 10, 2021, in a 185-page opinion, Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers held that Apple was not a monopoly and, therefore, that all of the Sherman Act causes of action failed. Judge Rogers did, however, hold that the restrictions on apps using alternative payment systems were antisteering provisions that violated the UCL. Epic has vowed to appeal. Apple has refused to let Fortnite, the Epic app that was the subject of the case, back into its eco-system.

Originally published in the Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, February 2022.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kelley Drye & Warren LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contact
more
less

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide