Failure to Supervise Selling Away Arbitrable as “Connected with Business”

Burr & Forman
Contact

Burr & Forman

The Sixth Circuit recently affirmed that failure-to-supervise claims against a brokerage firm over outside business activities it knew nothing about nevertheless were arbitrable under FINRA Rule 12200(2) as “arising in connection with the business activities of the member” firm.

The firm’s representative worked together with an outside financial advisor and others to divert a firm customer’s assets from an outside bank account to a fraudulent outside business activity.  The customers’ funds transferred into the brokerage account, out to a bank account and from there to the fraudulent investment.  The member firm’s alleged lack of supervision is arbitrable, even though the transactions did not transit or benefit the firm and – indeed, even though the firm was not aware of them.

The opinion is Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc. v. Mirgliotta, No. 17-3496 (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2018).

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Burr & Forman | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Burr & Forman
Contact
more
less

Burr & Forman on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide