Federal Court Finds That Agreement to Defer Payment of Salary Violates the Massachusetts Payment of Wages Statute


An increasingly common practice among employers, particularly start-ups, is to enter into agreements with senior managers to defer salary payments until certain financial targets are reached. The employees typically welcome these arrangements because they often own a portion of the business. However, a recent decision by the federal court in Massachusetts warns that these types of arrangements may be unlawful. In Stanton v. Lighthouse Financial Services, Inc., the court held that an agreement to defer the payment of salary violated the Massachusetts Payment of Wages statute and was therefore void.

Please see full bulletin for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.