FERC Chairman’s Letter To Senate Highlights FERC-CFTC Tension And A Voluntary Trader Ban In The JP Morgan $410 Million FERC Settlement

This past Monday, September 9, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) posted a letter from its chairman, Jon Wellinghopf, to Senators Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey responding to their inquiries on the relationship between FERC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and FERC’s recent $410 million settlement against J.P. Morgan Energy Ventures. Read Letter to Senators Warren and Markey from Chairman Wellinghopf.

On the CFTC relationship, the chairman said the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, had not yet been reached with the CFTC.  FERC wants access to the Large Trader Report provided by the Intercontinental Exchange to the CFTC.  The chairman said the data will allow “FERC to see the names and positions of parties that have a financial interest in the formation of prices in FERC’s jurisdictional markets.”  Wellinghopf Letter at 3.  In the absence of the MOU and the Large Trader Report, FERC has developed “automated algorithmic screens” for surveillance purposes. Id.

On another CFTC relationship issue, in Hunter v. FERC, 711 F.3d 155 (D.C. Cir. 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over manipulation in the futures markets, even if the activity affected prices in the physical markets for which FERC has exclusive jurisdiction.  The chairman said he viewed that opinion “narrow in scope.” Id. at 2  But market participants view the decision more broadly to include additional transactions and products squarely within FERC’s jurisdictional markets.  Therefore, the chairman said he supported a legislative fix to “ensure FERC has the full authority needed to police manipulation of wholesale physical natural gas and electric markets.” Id.

On the JP Morgan settlement, the total amount of the settlement had been reported at $410 million – a $285 million civil penalty and disgorgement of $125 million in revenues. But the chairman said that JP Morgan also agreed to waive $262 million of claims against the California Independent System Operator, thereby raising the total dollar value of the settlement.

Finally, while the chairman conceded that “[t]he Federal Power Act does not give the Commission authority to ban traders from electricity markets for market manipulation,” Id. at 4, he said that in the Settlement Agreement, “JP Morgan has assured the Commission that the traders who engaged in the bidding strategies at issue here will not participate in bidding generation into organized markets, or otherwise engage in power market trading, on behalf of JP Morgan.” Id.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.