Florida Court of Appeals Holds that an EEOC Charge Does Not Need to Specifically Allege the Florida Civil Rights Act to Exhaust Administrative Remedies Prior to Filing a Lawsuit.

Marshall Dennehey
Contact

Ramos v. Steak N Shake, Inc., 2D22-3465, 2023 WL 8791666 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 20, 2023)

Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal examined the issue of whether section 760.11, Florida Statutes, requires that the aggrieved party cite to the Florida Civil Rights Act (FRCA) in a charge filed with the EEOC. In October 2017, Steak N Shake hired Ramos as a grill operator. While employed, Ramos had an off-the-job car accident where he sustained a back injury. Ramos’s work schedule was allegedly reduced from 30 hours as a grill cook to six hours as a janitor. He filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC, which stated the facts but made no mention of the FCRA. The EEOC charge was dismissed, and Ramos subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of the FCRA. The Second District held that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of Steak N Shake and determining that Ramos failed to exhaust his administrative remedies simply because the EEOC charge did not include a citation to the FCRA.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Marshall Dennehey | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Marshall Dennehey
Contact
more
less

Marshall Dennehey on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide