FRB Approves Capital Plans of 25 Large Banking Holding Companies, but Rejects Capital Plans of Five Other Large Banking Organizations


The FRB released the results of its annual large bank holding company capital assessment exercise known as the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”). The FRB evaluated the capital adequacy and planning processes of the 30 largest bank holding companies, each of which has $50 billion or more of total consolidated assets. These 30 institutions have a combined $13.5 trillion in assets and hold roughly 80% of all U.S. bank holding company assets. The two primary gauges of the FRB’s stress test were the Tier 1 common ratio and the leverage ratio.

In its review, the FRB approved the individual capital plans of 25 large bank holdings companies, but rejected the capital plans of five major firms:  Citigroup, HSBC North America Holdings, Inc., RBS Citizens Financial Group Inc., Santander Holdings USA Inc. and Zions Bancorporation. The FRB stated that the first four were rejected for qualitative reasons, but Zions was rejected on the ground that it did not meet the minimum, post-stress Tier 1 common ratio of 5%.

The FRB stated that its objections to the capital plans of Citigroup, HSBC, RBS Citizens and Santander were chiefly based upon the FRB’s determination that these plans were deficient with respect to their ability to project revenue and losses under stress scenarios. Citigroup, which failed the same test in 2012, was cited by the FRB for, among other things, failure to correct certain previously identified issues in its capital planning processes.

As a result of the FRB’s determinations, each of these five institutions is required to resubmit its capital plan to the FRB following substantial remediation of the identified issues.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this informational piece (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin Procter LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.