FRB, FDIC and OCC Issue Final Rule Regarding Leverage Ratios for Largest Top-Tier Bank Holding Companies


On April 8, 2014, the FRB, FDIC and OCC (collectively, the “Agencies”) released a final rule (the “Final Rule”) concerning the leverage ratio standards for large, interconnected U.S. banking organizations.  The Final Rule applies to any U.S. top-tier bank holding company with more than $700 billion in total consolidated assets or more than $10 trillion in assets under custody (a “Covered BHC”).  The Final Rule also applies to any insured depository institution subsidiary of a Covered BHC (a “Covered IDI,” and together with the Covered BHC, a “Covered Organization”).  In July 2013, the Agencies proposed leverage ratios which were consistent with the ratio adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”); the Final Rule provides for several ratios that are higher than those adopted by the Basel Committee. 

Under the Final Rule, a Covered IDI must maintain a supplementary leverage ratio of at least 6% (up from 3% proposed by the Basel Committee), and a Covered BHC must maintain a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5% (up from 3%).  Under the Final Rule, a Covered BHC that maintains a leverage buffer of Tier 1 capital in an amount greater than 2% of its total leverage exposure is not subject to limitations on distributions or discretionary bonus payments.  The Final Rule is effective January 1, 2018 and currently applies to eight U.S. banking organizations.

The Agencies adopted the Final Rule under the premise that the largest banks have an outsized impact on the banking system, and therefore should be required to hold higher levels of capital, as strong capital is an important safeguard that helps financial institutions navigate periods of financial or economic stress.  The Agencies stated that they believe the Final Rule will strengthen the Covered BHCs, and indirectly, the financial industry, by decreasing the likelihood of capital shortfalls. 

Opponents of the Final Rule have noted that the Final Rule will make U.S.-based Covered Organizations less competitive in the international marketplace.  Further, some note that the Final Rule does little to limit systemic financial risk, as the Final Rule does not address the leverage ratios or capital requirements of participants in the “shadow” banking industry.  Last, a number of critics stated that the increased leverage ratios are arbitrary, and that there are no quantitative studies showing the cumulative impact of such changes.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this informational piece (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Goodwin on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.