FTC Settles with National Consumer Reporting Agency for Alleged Violations of FCRA


The FTC reached a settlement with a national consumer reporting agency and its debt collection affiliate for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Section 5 of the FTC Act. FCRA imposes obligations on consumer reporting agencies, including requirements to follow reasonable procedures to assure the accuracy of information reported to CRAs and to take certain measures with respect to consumer disputes of such information. According to the complaint, in violation of FCRA, the CRA did not follow proper dispute procedures, including refusing to investigate disputes, and failed to both follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the consumer report information it was providing and promptly correct errors on consumers’ reports. The FTC also alleged that the CRA’s debt collection affiliate violated the “furnisher rule,” which, among other things, requires entities furnishing information to CRAs to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the information provided. The FTC maintained that the CRA incorrectly informed consumers of reasons to dispute information in their file, shifted the burden of conducting reinvestigations to consumers and failed to meet certain procedural requirements for reinvestigation. The terms of the settlement require the CRA to pay civil money penalties, cease violations of FCRA, including, for example, by requiring consumers to contact third parties to resolve disputes, and submit to compliance monitoring.

The settlement comes just months after the FTC entered into a similar settlement agreement with another CRA also in the check authorization business (see August 20, 2013 Alert) and the CFPB’s December 2012 warning to CRAs for failure to comply with FCRA and its implementing regulation, Regulation V (see December 11, 2012 Alert).

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this informational piece (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin Procter LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.