Further comment on payday lending and deposit advances

more+
less-
more+
less-

As suggested by prior blog posts, I am no fan of the direction the CFPB, OCC and FDIC seem to be going with respect to payday and deposit advance loans. These agencies have all signaled a willingness to prohibit these loans without regard to Dodd-Frank’s definitions of the terms “unfair” and “abusive” and without applying the cost-benefit analysis required by the statutory language. My concerns are articulated in some detail in a comment letter I submitted to the OCC and FDIC yesterday on my own initiative. The apparent regulatory approach— which involves the substitution of visceral reactions in place of rigorous analysis—has disturbing implications that go well beyond the impact on payday loans and deposit advances.

Written by:

Published In:

OCC

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×