Gabelli v. SEC: the Supreme Court's Statute of Limitations Ruling Puts Pressure on Federal Agencies to Investigate More Aggressively and Sue More Quickly

more+
less-

In a sweeping decision that could impact numerous enforcement actions by a number of federal agencies, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the federal government’s argument that an agency should be entitled to the protection of the discovery rule in an enforcement action seeking a civil penalty for an alleged act of fraud.

The decision is Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission, issued on February 27, 2013. The SEC had brought suit under the Investment Advisers Act against alleged participants in a putative fraud involving “market timing.” Because the SEC sought a civil penalty, the action was subject to 28 U.S.C. § 2462, which states that “an action, suit or proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine ... shall not be entertained unless commenced within five years from the date when the claim first accrued ... .” This Section provides a general statute of limitations for any action seeking a civil penalty by a federal agency, unless a different limitations period applies under a particular statute. As the Supreme Court emphasized, Section 2462 “governs many penalty provisions throughout the U.S. Code.” Slip Op. at 2.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×