Got Pot? The Feds Try to Make Mortgagee Banks Liable Under the Crack House Statute

Banks holding mortgages now have one more thing to worry about: potential criminal and civil liability and forfeiture under the federal “crack-house” statute. Sound crazy? Read on, because late last year the four U.S. Attorneys in California threatened banks with liability simply because mortgaged properties were being used as medical marijuana dispensaries, even though such dispensaries are legal under state law.

First, the legal background: The federal crack-house statute (21 U.S.C. § 856) was enacted in the mid-1980's to combat the crack cocaine epidemic and crack-house phenomenon by creating criminal and civil liability for using property for drug operations involving any “controlled substance.” The property is also subject to forfeiture. (See 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7).) The crack-house statute, however, was drafted hurriedly and quite broadly. It covers those who “manage and control” the property, even as a “mortgagee,” if they know of the drug operations and make the property “available” for such use. (See § 856(a)(2)).

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »