Governor Signs Bill Imposing New Requirements On In-State And Out-of-State Employers Who Pay Commissions

Allen Matkins
Contact

Two score and eight years ago, the California legislature enacted AB 836 (Frew), Stats. 1963, ch. 1088. That legislation requires employers who pay their employees for services in California through commissions to provide those employees with a written contract setting forth the manner in which commissions are computed and paid. Labor Code § 2751. Violators face treble damages. Labor Code § 2752. The most interesting feature of these statutes, however, is the fact that they apply only to employers with “no permanent and fixed place of business” in California.

Constitutional Problems

Thirty six years after the AB 836 was enacted, a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business in Texas decided to challenge the constitutionality of the legislation. In Lett v. Paymentech, Inc., 81 F. Supp.2d 992 (N.D. Cal. 1999), U.S. District Court Judge Jenkins found that both Labor Code sections violated the Commerce Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Despite this holding, the two statutes remained in the code books for another decade.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide