Gunn v. Minton: The Supreme Court's Correction of the Federal Circuit's Overly Broad Assertion of Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims

more+
less-

For nearly two decades, the Federal Circuit has applied a lenient standard for federal jurisdiction that routinely sweeps state law claims into the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts merely because the claims require resolution of patent-law issues. The latest casualties of the Federal Circuit's approach are state-law malpractice claims against patent attorneys. The Federal Circuit has held that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts if resolution of a patent-law issue is necessary to resolve the claim.

The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in one such malpractice case, Gunn v. Minton, and held, in a unanimous decision, that the malpractice claim was not properly in federal court even though it raised an issue of patent law.

Originally published in New Matter - Volume 38, Number 1.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×