Kelly v. A.L. Williams Corp.

How does the statute of limitation affect a fraud claim in an ongoing business relationship?


The District Court held that the statute of limitations runs from the time that the fraud is detected, and barred further prosecution of the case. Kelly first became aware that he might have been defrauded after the company stopped paying him commissions on downline sales, and reassigned his downline. He argued with the company, but A.L. Williams' behavior continued over the next several years. The court held that he should have reasonably considered fraud at the first instance of the company's actions, and that it was from that time the statute of limitations began to run. Because Alabama's statute of limitations was 1 year upon discovery of fraud, the action was dismissed.

Full case and case summary are also available at:

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Federal, 11th Circuit, Alabama | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.