How to Avoid Enforcement Actions for Unfair or Deceptive Acts and Practices

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

‘‘Happy, Happy, Happy’’ is the phrase used by that towering philosopher Phil Robertson, from the TV show Duck Dynasty. You can be sure no bankers utter that phrase whenever a regulatory agency first breathes a word about possible Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices (UDAP) issues. But, you can be equally sure that federal agency enforcement attorneys and safety and soundness staff frequently use Phil’s phrase. After all, they ‘‘know’’ that banks want to quickly resolve UDAP issues and are unlikely to engage in litigation.

In light of recent settlements, we now know that the OCC and the FDIC are examining large banks for compliance with a consumer protection law, UDAP. What happened? Wasn’t that supposed to be the job of the CFPB?

Originally published in BNA’s Banking Report on August 27, 2013.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide