How to Avoid Enforcement Actions for Unfair or Deceptive Acts and Practices

more+
less-

‘‘Happy, Happy, Happy’’ is the phrase used by that towering philosopher Phil Robertson, from the TV show Duck Dynasty. You can be sure no bankers utter that phrase whenever a regulatory agency first breathes a word about possible Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices (UDAP) issues. But, you can be equally sure that federal agency enforcement attorneys and safety and soundness staff frequently use Phil’s phrase. After all, they ‘‘know’’ that banks want to quickly resolve UDAP issues and are unlikely to engage in litigation.

In light of recent settlements, we now know that the OCC and the FDIC are examining large banks for compliance with a consumer protection law, UDAP. What happened? Wasn’t that supposed to be the job of the CFPB?

Originally published in BNA’s Banking Report on August 27, 2013.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Compliance, Enforcement Actions, Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Consumer Protection Updates, Finance & Banking Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »