Illinois Becomes Latest State to Introduce Small Business Truth in Lending Act

Troutman Pepper
Contact

Troutman Pepper

On February 16, Illinois State Representative Hoan Huynh (D) introduced HB3064, the Small Business Truth in Lending Act, that would impose certain mandatory disclosure requirements for commercial financing transactions and require registration of small business finance companies and brokers. Illinois follows the lead of states such as New York, California, Utah, and Virginia which have each enacted legislation imposing additional requirements on small business financing transactions. The differences between the state requirements creates an increasingly complex multi-state regulatory environment for small business finance companies. We expect that additional states will continue to push legislation forward in this area, as legislators in Connecticut, Maryland, and Missouri have also introduced bills this year.

The Illinois bill would impose disclosure requirements on broad categories of commercial financing, including closed-end commercial financing, open-end commercial financing, sales-based commercial financing, factoring transactions, and “other forms” of commercial financing. Much like the requirements in New York and California, the Illinois bill provides for some variations in the disclosure requirements depending on the transaction type. For closed-end financing, the bill would require the following:

  • The total amount of commercial financing, and if different from the financing amount, the disbursement amount after any deductions or withholdings;
  • The finance charge;
  • The percentage rate calculated in accordance with the federal Truth in Lending Act;
  • The total repayment amount, which is the disbursement amount plus the finance charge;
  • The term of the financing;
  • The payment amounts or a description of the methods used to calculate the amounts and frequency and the amounts of the average projected payments per month;
  • A description of all other potential fees and charges not included in the finance charge, including draw fees, late payment fees, and returned payment fees;
  • Any fees that would be assessed for a prepayment in full; and
  • A description of collateral requirements or security interests, if any.

The bill does contain exceptions for certain financing providers such as banks and certain types of financing such as commercial mortgages and transactions of more than $2,500,000. However, much like California and New York, certain bank partners may not be exempt, as the exemptions appear to carve out some technology providers that have an arrangement to obtain an interest in the financing after origination, even if the transaction was originated by a bank.

Troutman Pepper routinely assists clients in assessing the applicability of and complying with commercial disclosure laws and will continue to monitor the developments in state and federal regulation of commercial finance.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Troutman Pepper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Troutman Pepper
Contact
more
less

Troutman Pepper on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide