The Delaware court of chancery held recently that control over a target company’s attorney-client privileged communications, including communications between the target company’s counsel and its pre-merger stockholders, passes to the acquiror upon the closing of the merger. Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP (Del. Ch. Nov. 15, 2013). As a result, the former stockholders of an acquired company were barred from asserting the attorney-client privilege over merger-related communications with the company’s legal counsel that the buyer discovered on the company’s computer systems after the closing of the merger.
The court noted, however, that the parties could have provided for a different result by contract through an appropriate provision in the merger agreement or other agreement.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Attorney-Client Privilege, Contract Drafting, Corporate Counsel, Disqualification, Fraudulent Inducement, Mergers, Privilege Waivers, Shareholders
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Mergers & Acquisitions Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising