Plaintiffs sued an escrow company for its role in a Ponzi scheme in which, according to a finding of fraud contained in a separate default judgment, non-parties Bradley Holcom and Jose Pinedo stole more than $6.4 million of plaintiffs’ investments. Plaintiffs asserted claims for, among other things, securities fraud under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, and aiding and abetting fraud. Defendant Citizens Title & Trust, Inc. moved to dismiss the securities fraud and aiding and abetting fraud claims, which motion was granted by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.
Plaintiffs invested cash with Mr. Holcom and Mr. Pinedo to allow them to purchase real property in Arizona, in exchange for which plaintiffs would receive an interest in the related promissory note and deed of trust. Plaintiffs contend that Mr. Holcom and Mr. Pinedo purchased properties with plaintiffs’ money, but rather than providing the investors with security interests in the properties, plaintiffs received a worthless “investment contract.” The real property, which had been purchased with plaintiffs’ money but actually was owned by Mr. Holcom and Mr. Pinedo or their controlled entities, subsequently would be sold to innocent third parties. According to plaintiffs, Citizens opened escrow accounts, acted as the escrow holder, and executed and delivered promissory notes and deeds of trust in connection with these transactions.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Remedies Updates, Securities Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising