IP Update, Vol. 14, No. 2, February 2011

more+
less-

IN THIS ISSUE:

Patents: Predictable Variations of Simple Mechanical Technology May Be Obvious, Even in the Face of Structural and Operational Differences; Judges Squabble Over the Interpretation of Claims in Light of the Specification; Who Is the “User” of a Claim System; Collateral Estoppel Bars Metabolite from “Eating Its Cake”; Federal Court Enjoy Broad Removal Jurisdiction Based on Arbitration Provision; Court Slices Up Damage Claim with Laser-Like Precision; Patent Reform Act of 2011; and USPTO Hands Down Guidelines to Boost Patent Quality.

Trademarks: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Trademark Dilution Standard, Expands Dilution Claims; and, California Supreme Court Expands Ability to Sue over Deceptive Product Labels.

Copyrights: Defendant Bears Significant Burden to Rebut Presumption of Copyright Validity; Second Circuit Finds Time-Barred Copyright Ownership Claim Prevents Dependent Copyright Infringement Claim; Copyright Licensee Must Own at Least One Exclusive Right for Standing; and, “Barefoot” Copyright Holder Did Not Put on His (Copyright Transfer) Shoes.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

McDermott Will & Emery on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×