IP Update, Vol. 14, No. 2, February 2011

more+
less-

IN THIS ISSUE:

Patents: Predictable Variations of Simple Mechanical Technology May Be Obvious, Even in the Face of Structural and Operational Differences; Judges Squabble Over the Interpretation of Claims in Light of the Specification; Who Is the “User” of a Claim System; Collateral Estoppel Bars Metabolite from “Eating Its Cake”; Federal Court Enjoy Broad Removal Jurisdiction Based on Arbitration Provision; Court Slices Up Damage Claim with Laser-Like Precision; Patent Reform Act of 2011; and USPTO Hands Down Guidelines to Boost Patent Quality.

Trademarks: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Trademark Dilution Standard, Expands Dilution Claims; and, California Supreme Court Expands Ability to Sue over Deceptive Product Labels.

Copyrights: Defendant Bears Significant Burden to Rebut Presumption of Copyright Validity; Second Circuit Finds Time-Barred Copyright Ownership Claim Prevents Dependent Copyright Infringement Claim; Copyright Licensee Must Own at Least One Exclusive Right for Standing; and, “Barefoot” Copyright Holder Did Not Put on His (Copyright Transfer) Shoes.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Civil Rights Updates, General Business Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McDermott Will & Emery | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »