IRS Proposes To Eliminate ‘Confusing’ 36-Month Non-Payment Testing Period for Cancellation of Debt

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact

The Internal Revenue Service recently proposed very well-received regulations under Section 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) that would eliminate the requirement for financial entities to treat debt as canceled after 36 months of non-payment for information reporting purposes.

Under the Code, an applicable financial entity (i.e., a (i) financial institution as defined in Code Sections 581 and 591(a) – including a domestic bank, trust company, building and loan or savings and loan association, but not including a REMIC, (ii) credit union, or (iii) Federal executive agency) that discharges (in whole or in part) indebtedness of a debtor in the amount of $600 or more during a calendar year must file an IRS Form 1099-C reporting the amount discharged to the debtor and to the IRS. Under Code Section 6050P and the current regulations, a financial entity’s obligation to file an IRS Form 1099-C is triggered when any of eight identifiable events occur. Seven of these events result in the actual discharge of debt.

However, the eighth event is a rebuttable presumption that 36 months without any payment on the debt by the debtor causes a discharge of the debt. A financial entity can rebut this presumption only by showing that it is undertaking significant, bona fide collection activity or other facts and circumstances that indicate the debt has not been discharged. The possibility that the presumption could be rebutted led to confusion about whether a debtor must report the amount shown on the IRS Form 1099-C as income.

In the preamble to the proposed regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS stated that the reporting requirements under Code Section 6050P should coincide with an actual discharge of debt to the greatest extent possible. If the new regulations are adopted in their current form, a financial institution will be required to report discharge of debt only upon the occurrence of one of the seven remaining identifiable events, all of which relate to the actual discharge of debt. The regulations are proposed to become effective the date they are published as final regulations in the Federal Register.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact
more
less

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide