Macris & Associates v. Neways, Inc.

Is a fraudulent transfer cause of action barred by res judicata when the transfer arose after the first case was filed?


The Utah Supreme Court held that Image's attempt at reincorporating as a new entity was a fraudulent transfer and because the new entity was established during the pendency of the previous litigation and could not be barred by res judicata. The Court did hold that Macris could not continue with his claim against Neways seeking to continue to collect damages from his previous claim. The cessation of doing business as Images cut off Macris' previous claim from accumulating additional damages.

The case and case summary are also available to view online at:

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates

Reference Info: | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Welcome to MLM Legal - a valuable resource to the Multi-Level Marketing and Direct Sales Industry. ... View Profile »

Follow Babener & Associates:

Reporters on Deadline