Is Prepetition Bad Faith “Cause” For Dismissal In A Chapter 7?

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact

In a recent case out of the Southern District of Florida, the Court outlined the standard for dismissal of an individual’s Chapter 7 case based on the Debtor’s pre-petition bad faith behavior.

The statutory language of § 707(a) outlines the three nonexclusive bases a chapter 7 case may be dismissed for “cause,” including unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, nonpayment of any fees or charges required under chapter 123 of title 28, and, upon motion by the United States Trustee, failure of a debtor in a voluntary case to timely file the information required under § 521(a)(1).

In the event that those three examples do not apply, the court must consider whether “cause” exists based on record evidence introduced in the case.  The controlling authority in the Eleventh Circuit as to what constitutes “cause” for dismissal  is In re Piazza, 719 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2013).  In Piazza, the Eleventh Circuit held that “the power to dismiss a bankruptcy case ‘for cause’ in § 707(a) includes the power to involuntarily dismiss a Chapter 7 case based on prepetition bad faith” and “a totality-of-the-circumstances approach is the correct legal standard for determining bad faith under § 707(a).  Id. at 1261, 1271.  The Piazza court explained that “[t]he totality-of-the-circumstances inquiry looks for ‘atypical’ conduct . . . that falls short of the ‘honest and forthright invocation of the Bankruptcy Code’s protections.’” Id.  A court evaluating whether bad faith has occurred is required to examine whether a debtor’s intentional acts or omissions to act “constitute a misuse or abuse of the provisions, purpose, or spirit of the Bankruptcy Code.” Id. at 1272.

The most important takeaway from this recent case is to be prepared and present evidence at the evidentiary hearing supporting your motion for dismissal based on “cause”.  Lack of record evidence establishing the bases outlined in § 707(a) or prepetition bad faith rising to the level of “cause” will certainly result in denial of your motion to dismiss.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Fox Rothschild LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Fox Rothschild LLP
Contact
more
less

Fox Rothschild LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide