Since the advent of “Say-on-Pay” over three years ago, the plaintiffs’ securities bar has attempted to rustle up claims relating to executive compensation matters discussed in proxy statements. The first wave against those companies with failed “say-on-pay” votes that nonetheless approved the compensation quickly sprang up and then ended. The second wave sought to enjoin annual meetings due to the purported inadequacy of disclosures in proxy statements; it largely failed despite two early successes. Undeterred, plaintiffs’ lawyers filed a third wave of shareholder litigation alleging that companies granted compensation in excess of applicable stock plan limits which was not tax-deductible under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) despite affirmations to the contrary in proxy statements. While the third wave continues, it too is stalling.
The height of the proxy season has passed, and so it is time to check the pulse of shareholder litigation concerning executive compensation matters. Our prior client alerts in November 2012 and February 2013 outlined the three waves of shareholder litigation concerning executive compensation. The first two waves have died while the third wave is waning. Below and in the attached Appendices, we update our metrics on the three waves of shareholder litigation. In addition, we offer tips to issuers to avoid being targeted in the third wave.
Please see full Alert below for more Information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.