Is Stem Cell Research Moral? Does Roe v. Wade help?

more+
less-
more+
less-

I was asked to argue the "pro" side of this topic because I stated I was against it. Did my own paper change my mind? I won't tell.

Embryonic stem cell research (ES) has been described as one of the most significant breakthroughs of this century in biomedicine. (Savulescu, 2000) The benefits of ES include gene therapy and the generation of replacement tissue and organs for transplant. With further ES, drug companies could test their products on stem cell lines to determine unexpected tissue problems. Deaths which have resulted from unexpected consequences of drug interactions could be prevented if ES testing was done.(Rolletschek A., 2004) Another important ES proposal would use ES cells to study early events in human development. Placental abnormalities, congenital birth defects and other unexplained events in early human development could be studied using ES.(J.A., 2000)

The benefits of ES are easy to discuss. Little controversy surrounds the potential benefits. Most controversy lies within the moral realm. Is it moral to use embryos to advance science? Is the moral issue moot at this time?

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Human Embryos, Roe v Wade, Stem cells

Published In: Civil Rights Updates, Health Updates, Privacy Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kevin Rider | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »