The Utah Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s granting of the preliminary injunction, holding that: (1) the company’s offer of continued employment was adequate consideration for the restrictive covenant; (2) the company had a protectable interest as the company developed a substantial degree of goodwill through defendant’s employment and the unique services she provided; and (3) the restrictive covenant was reasonable even though the covenant provided no geographic limitation, because its scope was limited to specific activities in a national business.

The case and case summary are also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/SystemConcepts_v_Dixon.php