The Maryland Court of Special Appeals held that the statue was constitutional because the meaning of the words used could be derived by their common usage by a person of normal intelligence. In interpreting statutes, the court held that a statute is not void for vagueness if the meanings of the words used could be easily determined from court proceedings, dictionaries, or common usage. Using this standard, the Maryland statute was constitutional.
Full case and case summary also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Schrader_v_Maryland.php
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.