The Ohio Supreme Court held that the state statute prohibiting pyramid schemes was not a prior restraint on free speech. The statute prohibits proposing, planning and preparing to operate a pyramid plan or program. Beckley challenged the statute's constitutionality, arguing that by prohibiting planning and proposing a pyramid program, the statute was an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech. The Court disagreed; saying that when read in conjunction with the penalty section of the statute, there was no risk of it being applied as a prior restraint on speech. The construction of a statute depends on its operation and effect, not on the form. By looking at the whole statute, the court disagreed with Beckley's argument, and reversed the trial court.
Case and case summary are also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Ohio_v_Beckley.php
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates
State, 6th Circuit, Ohio |
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising