Utah v. Hall

Is the Utah State Pyramid Scheme Act unconstitutionally vague?


The Utah Court of Appeals held that the statute was constitutional. Generally a statute is unconstitutionally vague when people of average intelligence must guess as to its meaning. The court found the statute in question to be perfectly clear, narrowly tailored to correct the perceived harm, and unambiguous. The program in question solicited new members for $19.95, who then could go out and solicit more members. As they progressed up the ladder, members would earn products that were still being lined up. The court held that the statute expressly prohibited this activity.

The case and case summary are also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Utah_v_Hall.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Criminal Law Updates, MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates

Reference Info: | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Welcome to MLM Legal - a valuable resource to the Multi-Level Marketing and Direct Sales Industry. ... View Profile »

Follow Babener & Associates:

Reporters on Deadline