Heath v. Engle , 123 P.3d 1 (2005)

Heath v. Engle

more+
less-

The Supreme Court held that Engle's failure to timely answer the requests for admissions without a reasonable excuse, was sufficient to admit each request and find for Heath on summary judgment. Engle responded to the requests only after Heath filed for summary judgment in the case, weeks after the responses were due, and without any communication with the Plaintiff. Because Engle did not present any reasonable excuse for her grossly delayed answers, the trial court properly deemed them all admitted under the Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure.

The full case and summary are available at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Heath_v_Engle.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates

Reference Info: | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Welcome to MLM Legal - a valuable resource to the Multi-Level Marketing and Direct Sales Industry. ... View Profile »


Follow Babener & Associates:

Reporters on Deadline