Illinois v. Knop , 199 Ill. App.3d 944 (1990)

Illinois v. Knop


The Appellate Court ruled that the founder could not rely on the opinion of the lower court declaring a similar scheme to be legal. Knop founded a pyramid sales program based on the operations of Unimax. In a different ruling, a state circuit court had found that Unimax was not a pyramid scheme. However, that ruling was overturned on appeal. In Knops case, he claimed that he could not be prosecuted under the state's pyramid statute because he had relied upon a "public officer's" interpretation of the statute. The Appellate Court disagreed, saying that to consider a circuit court judge to be a public officer within the meaning of the statute would render its language conflicting. Knops reliance was misplaced, especially since the case on which he relied was overturned on appeal. He could be properly tried under the state's pyramid statute.

Full case and case summary is also available at:

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:State, 7th Circuit, Illinois | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.