Kansas District Court Rejects "Reverse Alter Ego" Liability Theory


Plaintiffs entered into a Funding Agreement with defendant Gary Hall that directed the parties to create lending entities to facilitate real estate investments. The Funding Agreement provided that the parties would divide profits received by the lending entities. Defendant Bentley Investments of Nevada LLC was a lending entity Mr. Hall created pursuant to the Funding Agreement. Plaintiffs asserted that defendants failed to advance the profits contractually allocated to them, and thereby breached the Funding Agreement.

Defendant Bentley moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint on the basis that it failed to plead a breach of contract claim, because Bentley was not a party to the Funding Agreement. Plaintiffs contended that Bentley should be held liable under a "reverse alter ego theory" because it was responsible for Mr. Hall's breaches.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.