Legal Alert: Eighth Circuit Requires Arbitration Of FLSA Claim And Rejects Board Decision In D.R. Horton

by FordHarrison
Contact

Executive Summary:  The Eighth Circuit recently upheld the validity of a mandatory arbitration agreement containing a class action waiver and ordered the arbitration of an employee's collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act.  See Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc. (Jan. 7, 2013).  In reaching this decision, the Court rejected the analysis of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in D.R. Horton, Inc., which held that class action waivers violate employees' rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

Background

Bristol Care, the operator of a residential care facility for elderly residents, hired Sharon Owen as an administrator for its operation in Missouri.  The parties executed a Mandatory Arbitration Agreement ("MAA") to resolve, among other things,  "… claims or controversies for which a federal or state court or other dispute resolving body otherwise would be authorized to grant relief …" against the company.  The MAA contained an express reference to "claims for wages or other compensation" under the FLSA.  It also included an express waiver prohibiting the parties from arbitrating claims on behalf of a class.  The MAA did not, however, require the parties to waive the right to file a complaint with the EEOC or "any other federal, state or local agency designated to investigate complaints of harassment, discrimination, other statutory violations, or similar claims."

Owen, who was classified as an  administrative employee of Bristol Care, brought an action in 2011 on behalf of herself and similarly situated current and former employees for misclassification. Owen claimed the company improperly classified her as an exempt employee for overtime purposes and failed to properly compensate her for time worked in excess of forty hours per week.  Bristol Care  filed a motion to compel arbitration under the MAA, which the  district court denied.  On appeal the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court and ordered the parties to arbitrate the dispute.  Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 356 (Jan. 7, 2013)

Lower Court Decision

In denying the motion to compel arbitration, the lower court distinguished the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, saying it was a consumer case and not controlling precedent in employment situations.  In support for its decision denying the motion to compel arbitration, the district court relied in part  on D.R. Horton, Inc., and held that class actions waivers are invalid in FLSA cases because the FLSA provides for the right to bring a class (or collective) action.

Eighth Circuit's Decision

The Eighth Circuit reversed the lower court and ordered the parties to arbitrate the claim.  The Court held that nothing in the text or legislative history of the FLSA indicates a congressional intent to bar employees from agreeing to arbitrate FLSA claims individually, nor is there an "inherent conflict" between the FLSA and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).  Further, the Court held that "there is no inconsistency between either the FLSA text or its legislative history and the conclusion that arbitration agreements containing class waivers are enforceable in cases involving the FLSA."

The Court also rejected Owen's argument that the NLRB's decision in D.R Horton provides further evidence of a conflict between the FLSA and the FAA.  In D.R. Horton, the Board held that class action waivers violate employees' right to engage in protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the NLRA.  The Eighth Circuit found the Board's analysis unpersuasive because the MAA in this case "does not preclude an employee from filing a complaint with an administrative agency such as the Department of Labor…The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the NLRB, or any similar administrative body. Cf. Gilmer, 500 U.S. at 28…Further, nothing in the MAA precludes any of these agencies from investigating and, if necessary, filing suit on behalf of a class of employees."

Additionally, the Court held that even if the Board decision had addressed a class waiver similar to that contained in the MAA, the Court  "would still owe no deference to its reasoning" because, while the Board's construction of the NLRA is entitled to deference,  "the Board has no special competence or experience in interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act."  The Court also held that it is "not obligated to defer to [the Board's] interpretation of Supreme Court precedent." 

The Court went on to list a number of  district court decisions which similarly have declined to follow the NLRB's interpretation prohibiting class action waivers in arbitration agreements as well as similar decisions of other courts of appeal that have concluded that arbitration agreements containing class action waivers are enforceable under the FLSA. 

Finally the Court directed the parties to comply with the arbitration agreement, including the class action waiver, noting that the Supreme Court has affirmed class action waivers in other cases involving the arbitration of statutory rights.  The Court noted that the U.S. Supreme Court in Gilmer:

upheld a similar class action waiver in an employment contract brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act…  Thus the Court's conclusion in Gilmer forecloses the argument that Supreme Court precedent upholding the enforceability of class waivers is limited to the consumer context.

Employers' Bottom Line:   The Eighth Circuit's decision expressly rejects the NLRB's interpretation that the NLRA prohibits the enforcement of class action waivers in arbitration agreements and confirms that the FAA is to be considered in light of the federal policy favoring arbitration.  The requirement under Section 2 of the FAA for enforcement of arbitration agreements does not permit federal agencies to intervene into the contractual agreement for arbitration absent express Congressional authority granting such right to the agency.  At the same time, this MAA recognized that employees have an independent right to file a claim for violation of statutory rights with the appropriate federal agency and did not prohibit such claims. 

If you have any questions regarding this Alert, or other labor or employment related issues, please contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work or the author of the Alert, John Allgood, jallgood@fordharrison.com, who is an attorney in our Atlanta office.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FordHarrison | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

FordHarrison
Contact
more
less

FordHarrison on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.